KASS Backyard

KASS Urey

セックスのすすめ７

　This time, I launched a website, so I will naturally take up the issue of the declining birthrate, which is my main purpose, on that website as well.
　I decided to stop the insistence on keeping the solution at a high cost of ten thousand yen, and I decided to make it a small amount.
　Fortunately, when I look at the payment, I think that there is no one who is disadvantaged because no one has bought it.

　Now, let me put it in from the conclusion.
　One of them is to make it mandatory for high-income earners to raise children. Make the law.
　Two: the policy of the foster child.
　Three things: babysitters.
is.
　It is really easy, and it is easy to implement if the whole nation shares a sense of crisis.
　Let me explain each of the arguments a little bit.
　The first one.
　Legal content, for example.
　A small child (from the newborn to the age of four and a half years)
　　Age 25years old and over 45years old over the age of over 10million yen　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　

　　Raised one person per man and woman, regardless of whether they are married or single, during the three-year grace period　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　 　

　　You have to do it.
　More than three people are free.
　A couple with a total income of more than twenty million raise two children.

　　.
　A family with a total income of less than twenty million yen does not have this obligation.
　· Married people who do not fall under this category, single people, in terms of childbirth and child-rearing,　　

　　It is free as ever.
　Note: 〇 Three children in a family with a total income of more than thirty million yen

　　　　　　It has to be.
　　　　　　〇 Ten million yen in income per child is fundamental

　　　　　　However, for families over forty million yen, there are three people.　　　　

　　　　　　You have to raise more children than that.

　　　　　　Not to mention the obligation of raising four children, but four.　　　　

　　　　　　More parenting is free.
　　　　　　〇 Couples whose income total of two people do not reach 20million yen are mentioned above

　　　　　　As it is said, there is no obligation to raise a child.

　　　　　　If it is over 10 million yen, it means 200.

　　　　　　A couple under one million yen must raise their children alone.　　　　　　　

　　　　　　No, there is no obligation.
　　　　　　　　The above-mentioned conditions couple, zero, one, one or two children,

　　　　　　To grow it is free, because it is over ten million yen.　　　　　

　　　　　　That doesn’t mean you have to raise one person.　

　　　　　　yes.
　　　　　　〇 Single person (one person), 1 person per 10 million yen in income, 20

　　　　　　Two children for every million yen, three for every thirty million yen.

　　　　　　Mandatory, up to three people who earn more than forty million yen

　　　　　　The number of people who are above it is free is free.

　Let me tell you my thoughts on this one.
　Ten million yen is an example.
　Because it was a good number, it was easy to write, so I wrote it.
　However, in Japan, a person who earns more than ten million yen per year alone is probably more than the middle class.
　I think that many middle-class people, or the wealthy, have the power to disseminate their opinions to the world in society.
　If you impose obligations on these people, there will naturally be a strong reaction.
　It is expected to use all the connections and power of the wealthy to resist.

　Unfair and unequal.
　Why are they limited to their freedom?
　Why do we have to force marriage to be semi-compulsory?
　Why not have children, why do they have to have children?
　oh, my god.
　In particular, their freedom has been firmly adhered to, and will continue to be strongly resisted.
　For this reason, until now, the measures against the declining birthrate that can be understood even in the upper grades of elementary school were pretending to be unaware of the low birth rate, or pretending to be stupid, and the frivolity of low-income people was hidden in a good way.

　For this reason, it is important to the extent of the obligation to the rich.
　You have to get married, have sex and have children, and you have no obligation to do anything.
　Getting married and having sex is their freedom.
　Of course, even if you don’t have children, you are free.
　Only oblige them to be raised as their own children, whether they are real children or children born by others.
　In order to do so, we need to be able to take firm measures in place.
　There will never be a shortage of children and human trafficking should not be rampant.
　The wealthy will argue that raising children will limit their freedom.
　However, this is misguided from the experience of raising children.
　Of course, there is child support for the child.
　For this reason, it is aimed at the rich who are not burdened.
　If you can get a babysitter as you can as a part-time job as a student in the United States, you will not take away the free time of the caregiver so much.
　Even if there is an excuse to take away the free time of the child itself, free time is something that you create yourself.
　Child rearing may also be an opportunity to expand a new world or create a new free time.
　Above all, the declining birthrate should be understood more than others that the intellectuals, who make up the majority of the wealthy, are in crisis.
　If you are aware of the sense of responsibility and sense of crisis that we have to do something about it, it is a strange story to oppose it.
　
　There are many people who are raising pets with love.
　A human child will be raised with love even more.
　Since there is no meter in love, people do not know how much love they are raising it in the current society or in the real parent-child relationship, except for the person.
　However, abuse that others see and are clear is not allowed in today’s society.
　If it is recognized as an act of abuse, it will be strictly punished by law as it is until now.
　
　As I mentioned earlier, the second foster child policy and the third babysitter measures will be an important replenishment of the first.
　The foster child policy is essential for the measures I am considering of the declining birthrate.
　As you can see from what I have said so far, regardless of age, regardless of age, there is no need to worry about contraception, and even without worrying about subsequent child support, enjoying sex and experiencing childbirth, increasing the number of newborns by having sex and experiencing childbirth.
　The increase in newborns is preceded.
　Those who cannot be raised can be brought to foster children without resistance.
　It is important to create such an environment.
　When you are old enough to get pregnant, when you are old enough to get pregnant, you are free to have sex.
　In the past, adultery was committed, but at a young age she gave birth to a child.
　It is precisely this that the entire country needs to warmly watch over childbirth and child-rearing of the age, including those who are now in question, such as gender and discrimination, without discrimination.
　Initially, there may be an increase in the number of children given to foster children.
　However, rather than giving it to a foster child, it changes to be able to have sex on her own, get pregnant, give birth, and raise her.
　This leads to the increase in the number of newborns and the increase in the population.

　This also means that it uses the human psychology that I have described on Twitter so far.

　Some people say that by implementing what I just said, it is an act that is out of the human race, such as commodifying children like human trafficking, but those who know that the birthrate will progress by raising children with love, but those who are repeating the acquiescence of the unequal society and wasteful spending of the budget are not qualified to criticize.
　Also, to those who wear such Ichamon, let us brand it as evidence of a fool with no sense of crisis, who can only twist the idea of the street.

　Second, the delay in babysitting measures is also a sign of the stupidity of the Japanese people.
　The Japanese do not trust others.
　Only by raising them by themselves, I was proud of my children and others, and I raised them with love. I can say.
It is stuck in a kind of psychological action.
A fixed concept?
　But those things are shit old.
　In the United States, babysitters were already commonplace in the old drama “The Wife is a Witch” played by Elizabeth Montgomery.
　Japan, on the other hand, is a shitty day.
　In the drama, the babysitter was depicted as a part-time job of a young student.
　If the deregulation was possible so that babysitters could be done even for part-time students instead of the strict regulations, students would not have to struggle to find a part-time job, and the range of part-time jobs would increase.
　If the number of babysitters increases and you can ask for it cheaply, it will lead to the securing of freedom for the wealthy.

   The reason why the measures against the declining birthrate that I have talked about so far lead to population growth, but the biggest reason for pregnant women to refrain from pregnancy and childbirth is the anxiety of the future life.
　In the first place, the current measures against the declining birthrate are not prepared to take care of children throughout the country.
　Since there is an old-fashioned custom of having to raise children with family relatives, it is a policy that can be said to be a half-baked wasteful waste.
　There is not enough knowledge that population growth cannot be expected unless the people are united and promote measures against the declining birthrate.
　So why would it be possible to make it mandatory for the wealthy to raise children, leading to population growth?
　The rich people who are leading Japan are always and always remain self-sufficient, and yet they are still in power.
　Therefore, because they cannot allow themselves to see their own worries, those who are very close to the wealthy may be able to raise their income and cause them to suffer the same worries. ( (Laughs)
　People other than the rich can continue to have children, but they are free to continue to have children, but if the wealthy people around them start raising children all at once, they may be envious, and they may proceed to marriage, pregnancy, childbirth, and child-rearing, including envy and glory.
　In addition, if we break the taboos surrounding sex, from young people to the elderly, and open up the concept of sex, there may be some synergy.　
　For example, being inspired by the people around you, the pleasure becomes addictive, the birth of many children, the hardships of child-rearing is a turning point of fun, a new family connection may be formed, and another world may be seen.

　Since we will advance policies such as child-rearing tax reductions more than ever, it can be said that there are no disadvantages to adding them and having benefits.
　If you are looking for a disadvantage, it will be enough to make a woman’s breasts droop, nipples grow bigger, and pregnancy lines can be made.
　There may be a man who finds them attractive.

　In any case, it is natural that raising the income of young people who are worried about the future they are about to proceed with now and raising the level of their lives, but it will take too long to take measures against the declining birthrate and increase population.
　Again, as I have said, the cost-effectiveness is low.
　With reasonable and flexible thinking, we need the rich to be driven by measures against low birthrates.
　The advice for sex is over.
　In the future, I will make five and six small stories of sex recommended.
　I hope there are more corrections and additions to each one, but I wish you well.